The Formula for Better Outcomes
6 min read

Sit with this statement: “The power of your outcomes is determined by the quality of the questions that you ask yourself multiplied by the frequency that you ask, raised by the power of the integrity of your answers.”
Suppose you were to give it real thought. I mean, really unpack it. What could it teach you about yourself? What could it teach you about your practice of success in your life?
I challenge you to give the statement serious consideration before reading my blog post. Maybe even write your own blog post about what it means to you. Perhaps you agree, maybe you don’t. Possibly you'll come up with thoughts I haven't yet considered.
I would love to hear your thoughts. . .
1. Quality of the Questions You Ask Yourself
A high-quality question is not vague or random. It is focused, purpose-driven, and clearly connected to what is most important to you and your mission.
In scientific inquiry, progress starts by asking a well-defined question. The scientific method does not begin with answers, but with curiosity and good questions: “What causes this?” or “How can I test this idea?” These questions are designed to clarify, challenge, and uncover new insights.
Neuroscience research shows that simply posing thoughtful and meaningful questions stimulates areas of the brain linked with creative thinking, self-reflection, and decision-making. Over time, this habit strengthens neural pathways, making deep insight and problem-solving more natural (Gureckis & Markant, 2012; Kounios & Beeman, 2015). In other words, asking yourself good questions changes how your brain processes information.
Here are 10 questions you can ask yourself about the question you are formulating:
Is my question clear and focused, or is it vague or ambiguous?
- What is the purpose of this question, and what insight am I hoping to uncover?
- Am I asking what is not yet known, and honestly exploring areas of uncertainty?
- Does this question challenge my assumptions, rather than just confirm my current beliefs?
- Is my question open-ended, encouraging exploration instead of requiring only a yes or no?
- Does my question prompt me to reflect on my motives, beliefs, or the evidence at hand?
- Is the question specific enough to direct my inquiry, while remaining broad enough for discovery?
- Am I willing to ask questions that address uncomfortable or complex issues without fear?
- Does this question open the door to meaningful discussion, problem-solving, or further questions?
- Does my question align with values such as honesty, openness, and integrity?
2. Frequency: The Willingness to Keep Asking
It is not enough to ask a great question only once. Whether in science, personal growth, or everyday decisions, persistence makes progress possible. Frequently returning to self-inquiry encourages growth, learning, and deeper exploration (Metcalfe & Finn, 2020).
Each time you revisit a question or build upon a previous one, you give yourself the opportunity to see from new angles, update your beliefs, and uncover layers that were hidden at first. Insight develops not only from the quality of your questions but from your willingness to stay with them, letting them evolve as you do. Progress is rarely a straight line—it often comes from a cycle of questioning, reflecting, and questioning anew.
Cultivating a Questioning Mindset
A questioning mindset is about adopting openness and an eagerness to learn, rather than clinging to what you already know. This mindset helps you approach every situation as an opportunity to discover, rather than as a chance to prove yourself right. It echoes the Buddhist concept of “beginner’s mind,” which is a state of openness, curiosity, and freedom from preconceptions. The Zen teacher Shunryu Suzuki described it as: “In the beginner’s mind, there are many possibilities; in the expert’s mind, there are few.” Approaching life with a beginner's mind allows you to stay receptive to new knowledge and surprises in each moment.
The Value of Curiosity
Curiosity is a driving force behind intellectual growth and creativity. Psychologist Todd Kashdan has shown that curiosity is linked to greater happiness, resilience, and overall well-being. When you ask questions out of genuine curiosity, you not only learn more, but you also boost your capacity to face uncertainty and adapt to change. Kashdan emphasizes that “curiosity is the engine of growth,” fueling learning by making us enthusiastic seekers of new information and experiences (Kashdan, 2009).
What to Avoid: The Dangers of Ego-Driven Questions
It’s important to be mindful of the types of questions we ask ourselves and others. Questions meant to reinforce a sense of superiority, to make you feel clever, or to trigger confrontation can lead to a closed and defensive mindset. They shut down true inquiry and, often, connection. Instead of leading to understanding, these questions become a tool for judgment or division.
Choose Humility, Curiosity, Kindness, and Compassion
The healthiest questioning mindset combines humility with curiosity, kindness with compassion. Be willing to acknowledge what you don’t know and take delight in discovery. Ask questions that invite openness and connection, not defensiveness. True progress, intellectually, personally, and in our relationships, comes from the courage to be humble, the desire to understand, and the willingness to treat yourself and others with care as you search for answers.
3. Raised to the Power of the Integrity of Your Answers
When you raise a number to a power in mathematics, you greatly increase its effect. In this formula, integrity is the most influential element. It is the exponent that determines how much your questioning and persistence truly matter.
Integrity is more than mere honesty. It means wholeness and a commitment to truth, even when the truth is inconvenient or uncomfortable. High-integrity answers are not the ones that are easy or feel good. They are the answers that stand up to honest reflection, careful scrutiny, and a willingness to revise or reconsider when needed (Brown & Ryan, 2003).
This means not settling for tidy answers that solve problems on the surface, or for answers that fit what you want to hear. Instead, integrity requires self-respect, courage, and an openness to all the evidence, not just what supports your assumptions.
Why the Formula Works
If you ask superficial questions, ask infrequently, or refuse to face the full truth, your outcomes are likely to be limited. When all three elements work together, focused questions, consistent effort, and integrity in your answers, your possibilities for growth and achievement multiply.
This approach is supported by evidence from neuroscience, education, and mindfulness research. Thoughtful, persistent inquiry and honest reflection are the foundations of better decision-making, deeper learning, and stronger personal growth.
The quality of your outcomes does not come from answers alone. It is shaped most by the depth of your questions, your commitment to keep asking, and your willingness to answer yourself with true integrity.
References (APA Style)
- Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822–848. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822 (opens in a new tab)
- Gureckis, T. M., & Markant, D. B. (2012). Self-directed learning: A cognitive and computational perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(5), 464–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612454304 (opens in a new tab)
- Kounios, J., & Beeman, M. (2015). The Eureka Factor: Aha Moments, Creative Insight, and the Brain. Random House. https://www.amazon.com/Eureka-Factor-Moments-Creative-Insight/dp/1400068544 (opens in a new tab)
- Kashdan, T. B. (2009). Curious? Discover the Missing Ingredient to a Fulfilling Life. HarperCollins. https://www.amazon.com/Curious-Discover-Missing-Ingredient-Fulfilling/dp/0061661198 (opens in a new tab)
- Metcalfe, J., & Finn, B. (2020). Metacognition and control of study. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(3), 254–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420915878 (opens in a new tab)
Originally published on C.O.R.E Framework.


